We’re closing Free Your Mind…

We’re closing Free Your Mind and Try Again #trytry. This experiment was not completed, the first iteration draft was shared and everyone on the team gave feedback, although not everyone rated it for how compelling the first draft was.

Overall,l, Jodie will keep working on this piece of writing, connecting the dots between her other writing from the Jodie Jeopardy Experiments, #jodiejeopardy.

Jodie Jeopardy Dashboard

I pulled together a quick Google Spreadsheet to track and score the questions coming out of #jodiejeopardy. Here’s an overview of the dashboard:

I can imagine us doing something similar for Wye River as well.

Jodie Jeopardy Adjustments

Feedback from Alison on Slack:

I understand your metrics, but what will success be for this experiment versus failure? is the goal not to have repeat questions or is it that if there are repeaters that means it has more strategic importance? Also is the idea that the score differential would decrease over the week? Finally, I’d love to see the lists of questions, will those be kept in the data section?

I feel like our #Pulse call could look at one of these questions this week or in the future.

My response:

Yes, the idea is that the score differential would decrease over the week. I’ll update the experiment to clarify this. Jodie Jepoardy will definitely help us understand how to better assess strategic muscles.

Re: Repeaters. I’m not sure yet how to interpret repeat questions yet, so I’ll track, but no implied success metrics yet. One scenario is that repeated questions _and_ answers is a sign that this exercise is working, because the question is clearly occupying (and perhaps confusing or stressing out) @jodie’s mind, but she keeps coming back to the same answer. Another scenario is that the question keeps coming up, but Jodie keeps coming up with different, possibly diverging answers, which might be an indication that she’s working through possibilities or that she’s flip-flopping. Too soon to tell, so just want to observe and see.

We’ll track this exercise in our usual meeting log, so you’ll be able to follow Jodie’s questions and answers there. As I synthesize, I’ll make that available somewhere as well.

#jodiejeopardy

We had our second #pulse…

We had our second #pulse call today with Miles River. We tested our alignment around what we mean when we talk about porosity within the STP Network. In checkouts today and last week, there was agreement of improved alignment after the call.

M&M Week 7 Workout: April 10, 2017

This week, we’ll go back to the success spectrum, this time applying it to our shared work to the end of 2017 (as opposed to the individual project spectrums we all did in Week 5).

Remember what you learned from previous workouts: To get to a good spectrum, at some point, you have to shift away from just adding, and you have to start editing. Don’t be afraid of making a mistake, and don’t be afraid of editing other people’s work. If there are objections, that opens up opportunities for discussion. And if there are no objections, then you have made someone else’s work better — collaboration at work!

  1. Take one minute to pause and breathe deeply together in silence. (1min)
  2. Do a brief checkin with your partner. (3min)
  3. Warmup: Review Previous Work (10min)
    1. In our shared Google Doc, find your spectrums from Week 5, and take a few minutes to review. How did you do?
    2. Review your spectrums with your partner. Given your experiences, what would you have changed about your spectrums (if anything)? What makes a spectrum valuable?
  4. Workout: Success Spectrum (40min)
    1. Take a few minutes to imagine what our project would look like if it were successful in the timespan you both have chosen.
    2. Go to the Week 7 section in our shared Google Doc. Take five minutes to start capturing the different ranges of what success would look like — from minimum (i.e. must happen to call the project successful) to target (i.e. going for it, but probably won’t hit all of these) to epic (i.e. not going for it, but would be amazing if it happened).
    3. Take five minutes to capture what failure would look like. Review and adjust your minimum success column to make sure it’s consistent with your failure column.
    4. Compare your spectrums with your partner. Discuss what’s similar, what’s different, and how you’d resolve those differences. Now go to our actual success spectrum for 2017 and incorporate your shared work. This not only means adding to the spectrum, but deleting what’s no longer relevant. The shared spectrum should look cleaner after you’re both done than it was before. (20min)
  5. Quickly debrief the exercise:
    • How did the experience feel?
    • What did you learn?
  6. Checkout: Take a minute to share with your partner how you’re feeling and what you’re thinking. (5min)
  7. Each of you should post one brief takeaway as a comment to this post. It doesn’t have to be comprehensive or incredibly detailed. I’d strongly encourage you to share your takeaway immediately after your workout. Make it a point to read (and respond to, if so moved) other people’s takeaways every week.

If you’d like to read the generic cards for the exercises above (which include design thoughts and variations), see:

#workout

M&M Week 6 Workout: March 27, 2017

This week, we’ll exercise our systems thinking muscles and will work on surfacing our respective theories of change about the STP work we’re all doing together.

  1. Take one minute to pause and breathe deeply together in silence. (1min)
  2. Do a brief checkin with your partner. (3min)
  3. Warmup: One-Minute Drill — Question Variation (15min)
    1. Take a minute to consider the following: What should be our highest priority goal in 2017 for the work we’re doing together for Wye River (and beyond)? You can pick one of the goals in our planning document, or you can come up with a different one.
    2. Decide who will share first.
    3. Take one minute to share your answer. Your partner should listen quietly and keep strict time. Unlike previous times we’ve done this exercise, I encourage you to take notes in the appropriate section of our shared Google Doc.
    4. Unlike previous exercises, we won’t repeat back yet. First, switch with your partner, so that your partner is answering the question, and you’re taking notes.
    5. Take five minutes to replace your notes in the Google Doc with a series of questions that represent partner’s answer. It should include questions that your partner asked (possibly reframed) and questions that your partner answered without asking. Make sure you delete your previous notes — only the questions should remain.
    6. Compare your notes with each other. Give each other a score between one to five based on how well you think the questions represent what you were trying to say, with five being a perfect reflection. Discuss and revise.
    7. Hold up between one to five fingers based on how well the person reflected back what you said, with five being a perfect reflection.
    8. Correct or improve your partner’s question synthesis. Don’t be afraid to nitpick — nuances are important.
    9. Quickly debrief the exercise. What did you notice? How did you feel? What did you learn?
  4. Workout: Five Whys (30min)
    1. Start with one person’s answer to the warmup question, and ask, “Why?” This is your first Why.
    2. For each of your partner’s answers, ask, “Why?” again. Repeat this until you’ve asked and your partner has answered, “Why?” a total of five times.
    3. Switch.
    4. Quickly debrief the exercise:
      • How did the experience feel?
      • What did you learn?
  5. Checkout: Take a minute to share with your partner how you’re feeling and what you’re thinking. (5min)
  6. Each of you should post one brief takeaway as a comment to this post. It doesn’t have to be comprehensive or incredibly detailed. I’d strongly encourage you to share your takeaway immediately after your workout. Make it a point to read (and respond to, if so moved) other people’s takeaways every week.

This week’s homework:

#workout

M&M Week 5 Workout: March 20, 2017

Over the next four weeks, we’re going to take our warmed up synthesis muscles and start applying them toward strategy. We kick things off with an exercise you’re all already very familiar with — the success spectrum. In the workout itself, you’re going to be doing the spectrum for one of your own projects, but the homework will be about our collective spectrum for this project.

For this workout, think of a project you’re working on right now or are about to start. It could be related to the work we’re doing together at STP, but it doesn’t have to be.

Remember what you learned from the previous four workouts and our group checkin. To get to a good spectrum, at some point, you have to shift away from just adding, and you have to start editing. Don’t be afraid of making a mistake, and don’t be afraid of editing other people’s work. If there are objections, that opens up opportunities for discussion. And if there are no objections, then you have made someone else’s work better — collaboration at work!

  1. Take one minute to pause and breathe deeply together in silence. (1min)
  2. Do a brief checkin with your partner. (3min)
  3. Warmup: Question Brainstorm (10min)
    1. In our shared Google Doc, find your section, and take five minutes to write down all of the questions that come to mind about your project. This exercise is about quantity, not quality, so just write, don’t edit.
    2. Take a minute to cluster your questions.
    3. Rewrite your Yes / No questions into non-Yes / No questions. Help your partners with this!
    4. Identify (with your partner’s help) one or two questions that will most help you move forward with your project.
  4. Workout: Success Spectrum (40min)
    1. Take a few minutes to imagine what your project would look like if it were successful?
    2. Go to the appropriate section in our shared Google Doc. Take five minutes to start capturing the different ranges of what success would look like — from minimum (i.e. must happen to call the project successful) to target (i.e. going for it, but probably won’t hit all of these) to epic (i.e. not going for it, but would be amazing if it happened).
    3. Take five minutes to capture what failure would look like. Review and adjust your minimum success column to make sure it’s consistent with your failure column.
    4. Review your success spectrum with your partner. Exchange feedback. (5 min each)
    5. Revise your success spectrum based on your discussion, and quickly share your changes with your partner. (5 min each)
    6. Quickly debrief the exercise:
      • How did the experience feel?
      • What did you learn?
  5. Checkout: Take a minute to share with your partner how you’re feeling and what you’re thinking. (5min)
  6. Each of you should post one brief takeaway as a comment to this post. It doesn’t have to be comprehensive or incredibly detailed. I’d strongly encourage you to share your takeaway immediately after your workout. Make it a point to read (and respond to, if so moved) other people’s takeaways every week.

This week’s homework:

  • We currently have a messy, out-of-date success spectrum for our 2017 plan. This week, start cleaning up the original and create a new spectrum here. Do what you can, see what others do, and we’ll see where we are at the end of next week.

If you’d like to read the generic cards for the exercises above (which include design thoughts and variations), see:

#workout

M&M Week 4 Workout: March 6, 2017

We’ll conclude our first set of synthesis and alignment exercises with a repeat of last week’s workout. You’ll need lots of scratch paper and a pen. Have your smartphones ready so that you can photograph and email your work to your partner throughout the workout.

  1. Take one minute to pause and breathe deeply together in silence. (1min)
  2. Do a brief checkin with your partner. (3min)
  3. Warmup: One-Minute Drill (10min)
    1. Take a minute to consider the following: Describe a skill that’s taken you a long time (at least a year) to get good at. What was your learning process like?
    2. Decide who will share first.
    3. Take one minute to share your answer. Your partner should listen quietly and keep strict time. Don’t take notes.
    4. Share the same answer again for one minute. You may refine or add to your answer if you’d like.
    5. The listening partner should take one-minute to reflect back what she or he heard.
    6. Hold up between one to five fingers based on how well the person reflected back what you said, with five being a perfect reflection.
    7. Correct whatever your partner may have misheard. Don’t be afraid to nitpick — nuances are important.
    8. The listening partner should take one more minute to reflect your story back again.
    9. Hold up between one-to-five fingers based on how well the person reflected back what you said.
    10. Switch with your partner, and repeat the exercise.
    11. Quickly debrief the exercise. What did you notice? How did you feel? What did you learn?
  4. Workout: Working iteratively (40min)
    1. We’re going to be do the same iterations exercise we did last week. Don’t worry about perfection. Use this as an opportunity to explore and refine lots of different ideas. Part of the point is to experience progress through multiple, rapid iterations and detaching yourself from previous work.
    2. Review our current shared framework for alignment. Give a score between one (being the worst) and five (being the best) for how effective and useful the framework is right now. Be brutally honest.
    3. Individually, take up to five minutes to create a new framework for “alignment” on your scratch paper. Timebox this exercise. It’s not important for it to be complete or perfect, as you’ll have the opportunity to iterate. Email a photograph of your work to your partner, so that she or he can review it.
    4. Once again, consider the questions above, and evaluate your partner’s framework on a 1-5 scale. Quickly explain the reason for your score.
    5. Physically tear up your work, and recycle it. Don’t skip this step.
    6. Do another iteration for up to five minutes, again sharing and scoring your partner’s work. Do as many iterations as you can (at least three total) until you have about 15-minutes left in your workout.
    7. Quickly debrief the exercise:
      • How did the experience feel?
      • What did you learn?
  5. Checkout: Take a minute to share with your partner how you’re feeling and what you’re thinking. (5min)
  6. Each of you should post one brief takeaway as a comment to this post. It doesn’t have to be comprehensive or incredibly detailed. I’d strongly encourage you to share your takeaway immediately after your workout. Make it a point to read (and respond to, if so moved) other people’s takeaways every week.

This week’s homework:

  • Based on your work, once again review and refine our shared framework for “alignment” in our shared Google Doc. We’ll go over this together next Monday at our group checkin.

If you’d like to read the generic cards for the exercises above (which include design thoughts and variations), see:

#workout

M&M Week 3 Workout: February 27, 2017

This week, we will once again exercise our synthesis and alignment muscles, this time with a focus on working iteratively. You’ll need lots of scratch paper and a writing implement of some sort. Have your smartphones ready so that you can photograph and email your work to your partner throughout the workout.

  1. Take one minute to pause and breathe deeply together in silence. (1min)
  2. Do a brief checkin with your partner. (3min)
  3. Warmup: Color / Advance. This warmup was contributed by Alison! (10min)
    1. This is an exercise in storytelling as well as giving / receiving feedback. Don’t be a passive listener. Use it as an opportunity to be playful and interactive.
    2. Take a few minutes individually to think about, “What did you do over the weekend?”
    3. Decide who will share first.
    4. Start sharing your answer.
    5. Your partner should instruct you either to “color” or “advance” whenever it feels appropriate. If she or he says, “Color,” slow down and start going into more detail. If she or he says, “Advance,” move on to the next part of the story. Your partner should offer these instructions at least 3-5 times over the course of a 2-3 minute story.
    6. Switch with your partner, and repeat the exercise.
    7. Quickly debrief the exercise. What did you notice? How did you feel? What did you learn?
  4. Workout: Working iteratively (40min)
    1. Again, we’re going to be exercising our muscles in giving / receiving feedback as well as working iteratively. Expect the first few iterations of this exercise to be bad. Part of the point is to experience progress through multiple, rapid iterations and detaching yourself from previous work.
    2. Review our current shared framework for alignment. Remember, the purpose of this framework is to help us know what we’re all talking about when we’re saying we’re trying to “align the leaders.” Following the framework, consider the following questions:
      • What would it look like for the leaders to be aligned around vision? How aligned are they right now?
      • What would it look like for the leaders to be aligned around values? How aligned are they right now?
    3. Based on your answers, give a score between one (being the worst) and five (being the best) for how effective and useful the framework is right now. Be brutally honest.
    4. Individually, take up to five minutes to create a new framework for “alignment” on your scratch paper. Timebox this exercise. It’s not important for it to be complete or perfect, as you’ll have the opportunity to iterate. Email a photograph of your work to your partner, so that she or he can review it.
    5. Once again, consider the questions above, and evaluate your partner’s framework on a 1-5 scale. Explain the reason for your score.
    6. Physically tear up your work, and recycle it. Don’t skip this step.
    7. Do another iteration for up to five minutes, again sharing and scoring your partner’s work. Do as many iterations as you can (at least three total) until you have about 15-minutes left in your workout.
    8. Quickly debrief the exercise:
      • How did the experience feel?
      • What did you learn?
  5. Checkout: Take a minute to share with your partner how you’re feeling and what you’re thinking. (5min)
  6. Each of you should post one brief takeaway as a comment to this post. It doesn’t have to be comprehensive or incredibly detailed. I’d strongly encourage you to share your takeaway immediately after your workout. Make it a point to read (and respond to, if so moved) other people’s takeaways every week.

This week’s homework:

  • Based on your work, once again review and refine our shared framework for “alignment” in our shared Google Doc.

If you’d like to read the generic cards for the exercises above (which include design thoughts and variations), see:

#workout

Bucketing and Synthesis

bucketing

When we’re synthesizing, a lot of what we’re doing is putting things into buckets. The hope is that the buckets help us make sense of things. For this to hold true, we need to make sure we’re using the right buckets for the right reasons… and the right people. Figuring this out is hard and takes lots of tries. For this reason, good synthesis usually includes lots of iterations where different bucketing schemes are validated with the people who will use them. Bad synthesis usually stops at one or a few iterations, with little to no testing.

One important thing to remember about bucketing is that there doesn’t have to be just one scheme for everything. Different bucketing schemes might work better in different circumstances. Be conscious of the different levels and intentions.

#design